↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002866.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruwan J Fernando, Abdul H Sultan, Christine Kettle, Ranee Thakar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 234 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Postgraduate 23 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 59 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Psychology 16 7%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 67 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,681,976
of 19,645,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,804
of 11,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,085
of 240,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,645,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.