The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for tinnitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007946.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhaoli Meng, Shixi Liu, Yun Zheng, John S Phillips |
| Abstract |
Tinnitus is the perception of sound, in the ear or in the head, in the absence of any external acoustic stimulation. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive means of inducing electrical currents in the brain, and has received increasing attention in recent years for the treatment of many neuropsychiatric disorders, including tinnitus. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 21% |
| Unknown | 50 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 33% |
| Psychology | 18 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,679,830
of 26,329,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,169
of 13,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,119
of 146,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.