↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Planned early delivery versus expectant management for monoamniotic twins

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Planned early delivery versus expectant management for monoamniotic twins
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008820.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis Shub, Susan P Walker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Researcher 17 8%
Other 14 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 77 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 81 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,425,962
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,809
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,150
of 281,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.