The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006353.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joan Webster, Abdullah Alghamdi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
Canada | 2 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Belgium | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 352 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 43 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
Researcher | 38 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 9% |
Other | 29 | 8% |
Other | 71 | 20% |
Unknown | 103 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
Psychology | 10 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
Engineering | 8 | 2% |
Other | 42 | 12% |
Unknown | 120 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,631,532
of 26,623,241 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,091
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,374
of 280,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.