↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
Title
Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006353.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Webster, Abdullah Alghamdi

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 352 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Postgraduate 32 9%
Other 29 8%
Other 71 20%
Unknown 103 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 8%
Psychology 10 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 120 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,631,532
of 26,623,241 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,091
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,374
of 280,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.