↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different functional treatment strategies for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Different functional treatment strategies for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002938.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gino MMJ Kerkhoffs, Peter AA Struijs, Rene K Marti, Willem JJ Assendelft, Leendert Blankevoort, C N van Dijk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Andorra 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 23%
Other 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Sports and Recreations 17 12%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 27 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,576,527
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,096
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,188
of 210,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.