↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Urquhart, Rosemary Currell, Maria J Grant, Nicholas R Hardiker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 4 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 242 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 26%
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 57 22%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 23%
Social Sciences 28 11%
Psychology 17 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 32 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,439,968
of 17,347,018 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,642
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,817
of 235,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,347,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.