↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical interventions for treating acute fractures or non‐union of the middle third of the clavicle

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
Title
Surgical interventions for treating acute fractures or non‐union of the middle third of the clavicle
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007428.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mário Lenza, Flávio Faloppa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 283 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 18%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 75 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Psychology 8 3%
Engineering 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 91 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,895,499
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,447
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,222
of 280,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.