↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008818.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Pidala, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Claudio Anasetti, Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja, Ambuj Kumar

Abstract

Consolidation chemotherapy, autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and allogeneic HCT represent potential treatment alternatives for post-remission therapy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but there is genuine uncertainty regarding the optimal approach.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Other 13 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Unspecified 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 22 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2011.
All research outputs
#7,860,057
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,703
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,134
of 95,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.