↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Macular grid laser photocoagulation for branch retinal vein occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Macular grid laser photocoagulation for branch retinal vein occlusion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008732.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fook Chang Lam, Seen N Chia, Richard MH Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 41 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 47 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,943,688
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,207
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,590
of 279,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#188
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.