↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin E for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin E for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karla Soares-Weiser, Nicola Maayan, John McGrath

Abstract

Antipsychotic (neuroleptic) medication is used extensively to treat people with chronic mental illnesses. Its use, however, is associated with adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD) - a problem often seen as repetitive involuntary movements around the mouth and face. Vitamin E has been proposed as a treatment to prevent or decrease TD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 33%
Psychology 12 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 15 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,420,715
of 17,391,055 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,119
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,481
of 110,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,391,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.