↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diuretics acting on the distal renal tubule for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Diuretics acting on the distal renal tubule for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001817.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audra Stewart, Luc P Brion, Iris Ambrosio-Perez

Abstract

Lung disease in preterm infants is often complicated with lung edema.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 35 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,541,025
of 20,856,737 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,062
of 12,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,164
of 120,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,856,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.