| Title |
Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002869.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita J Gagnon, Jane Sandall |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 525 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 76 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 12% |
| Researcher | 64 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 97 | 18% |
| Unknown | 140 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 113 | 21% |
| Psychology | 56 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 8% |
| Unknown | 151 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,210,964
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,752
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,007
of 68,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.