↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003773.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kannaiyan S Rabindranath, James Adams, Alison M MacLeod, Norman Muirhead

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Italy 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 222 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 15%
Other 35 15%
Student > Postgraduate 32 14%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 32 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 39 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,922,836
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,912
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,238
of 232,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.