↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pancreatic enzymes for chronic pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Pancreatic enzymes for chronic pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006302.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nusrat Shafiq, Surinder Rana, Deepak Bhasin, Promila Pandhi, Puja Srivastava, Surjit S Sehmby, Raj Kumar, Samir Malhotra

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 30 28%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 26 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#19,769,406
of 22,202,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,890
of 12,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,256
of 250,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#247
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,202,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.