↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006432.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Coupar, Alex Pollock, Frederike van Wijck, Jacqui Morris, Peter Langhorne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 250 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 23%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 14%
Neuroscience 22 8%
Engineering 17 7%
Psychology 15 6%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 49 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,733,216
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,366
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,303
of 241,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.