↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002788.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Perry, Jeffrey J, Lee, Jacques S, Sillberg, Victoria AH, Wells, George A

Abstract

Patients requiring emergency endotracheal intubation often require a rapid sequence induction (RSI) intubation technique to protect against aspiration or increased intracranial pressure, or to facilitate intubation. Succinylcholine is the most commonly used muscle relaxant because of its fast onset and short duration; unfortunately, it can have serious side effects. Rocuronium has been suggested as an alternative to succinylcholine for intubation. This meta-analysis is an update since our initial Cochrane systematic review in 2003.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
United States 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 135 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 18%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Postgraduate 23 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 38 26%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 80%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 13 9%