RT @AnnMemmott: "It's the only evidence-based 'therapy'", they're told. Here's the evidence base: https://t.co/WaybOQjYP3 Cochrane Review.…
"It's the only evidence-based 'therapy'", they're told. Here's the evidence base: https://t.co/WaybOQjYP3 Cochrane Review. Ultimate independent audit. No evidence of any change in 'problem behaviour'. Weak effects after 2 yrs for other stuff (!!) <sips
RT @abaukdiscussion: Bad behaviour from Starlight (who thinks anything that changes behaviour is ABA) and ABA pals. Attacks a highly respec…
RT @abaukdiscussion: Bad behaviour from Starlight (who thinks anything that changes behaviour is ABA) and ABA pals. Attacks a highly respec…
RT @fodderfigure: If you're curious, there's actually not a lot of evidence to support that it does at all: https://t.co/qbTCQ6jCP3
RT @Alderick_Aut: @StandingHannah @commaficionado Here is a link to a study that shows ABA techniques aren't significantly better than othe…
RT @Alderick_Aut: @StandingHannah @commaficionado Here is a link to a study that shows ABA techniques aren't significantly better than othe…
RT @Alderick_Aut: @StandingHannah @commaficionado Here is a link to a study that shows ABA techniques aren't significantly better than othe…
@StandingHannah @commaficionado Here is a link to a study that shows ABA techniques aren't significantly better than other techniques. See a few posts above about how ABA is used even today. https://t.co/srpbUFWnlG
Well would you fucking look at that: https://t.co/0d6qN2148C
RT @slooterman: The actual scientific basis for intensive ABA is poor, according to a Cochran Review. https://t.co/ZFaXUfJ4aQ
RT @milton_damian: @autistinquisitr @d_a_keldsen @A4AOntario Ascientific? Like those supporting the use of EIBI you mean? https://t.co/2HuB…
RT @AnnMemmott: https://t.co/WaybOQjYP3 Here's that Cochrane Review (international audit, top quality) of behaviour interventions inc. ABA.…
https://t.co/WaybOQjYP3 Here's that Cochrane Review (international audit, top quality) of behaviour interventions inc. ABA. "Differences were not found for the severity of autism symptoms or a child's problem behavior".
@autistinquisitr @d_a_keldsen @A4AOntario Ascientific? Like those supporting the use of EIBI you mean? https://t.co/2HuBa1qGCw
@ianbirrell @RightfulLives @thetimes Wanting a starting point? https://t.co/WaybOQjYP3 The 'gold standard' audit of what works, and what doesn't. Cochrane Reviews. ABA based Positive Behaviour Support is founded on this EIBI method. No evidence of succes
RT @AnnMemmott: https://t.co/WaybOQjYP3 Here's one, for example. Early Intensive Behaviour Interventions (which include ABA). Conclusion -…
https://t.co/WaybOQjYP3 Here's one, for example. Early Intensive Behaviour Interventions (which include ABA). Conclusion - research hasn't proved anything much at all. Watch for people picking out a few words from it to claim it works. This is its summary
Bad behaviour from Starlight (who thinks anything that changes behaviour is ABA) and ABA pals. Attacks a highly respected autistic advocate for sharing independent research that concluded ABA evidence is low /v low quality? The research https://t.co/yQ77R
RT @AnnMemmott: They hope a 2013 paper on alleged benefits of early intervention will help, but they did not seek out the Cochrane paper ht…
RT @AnnMemmott: They hope a 2013 paper on alleged benefits of early intervention will help, but they did not seek out the Cochrane paper ht…
RT @AnnMemmott: They hope a 2013 paper on alleged benefits of early intervention will help, but they did not seek out the Cochrane paper ht…
They hope a 2013 paper on alleged benefits of early intervention will help, but they did not seek out the Cochrane paper https://t.co/PYASA1eR6N :early intervention re autism is only slightly more effective than dancing round a stick of celery* *I may hav
@OcsbT Didn't behaviorbabe breach BCBA ethics code with the Cardgate Scandal? https://t.co/Taqtx8I7j5 Didn't Cochrane confirm in their latest review of ABA research that its research evidence base is low/very low quality? https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS
RT @abaukdiscussion: #TodayInABA proponents dismiss a survey of 5,500 autistics showing only 4% pro-ABA. But hey why expect a multi-$bn be…
RT @abaukdiscussion: #TodayInABA proponents dismiss a survey of 5,500 autistics showing only 4% pro-ABA. But hey why expect a multi-$bn be…
RT @abaukdiscussion: #TodayInABA proponents dismiss a survey of 5,500 autistics showing only 4% pro-ABA. But hey why expect a multi-$bn be…
RT @abaukdiscussion: #TodayInABA proponents dismiss a survey of 5,500 autistics showing only 4% pro-ABA. But hey why expect a multi-$bn be…
@LouisBusch @autistics4aba @1_Non_Blonde Research quality low/very low for lots reasons: https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS Give us a kid for 20-40 hrs a week and we can train them to robotically respond to name in 3 secs 80% of time. Nothing about mental well-be
RT @abaukdiscussion: #TodayInABA proponents dismiss a survey of 5,500 autistics showing only 4% pro-ABA. But hey why expect a multi-$bn be…
#TodayInABA proponents dismiss a survey of 5,500 autistics showing only 4% pro-ABA. But hey why expect a multi-$bn behaviourist industry to look at how and why ABA psychological manipulation of vulnerable, misunderstood, disabled kids for up to 40 hrs/wk
@Sonic_counselor @autistics4aba @HydraheadHunter @1_Non_Blonde @LKocmarek @theautismcafe @CraigRigden @MEEKSVS @PhilipSavLerner @rainbows_with @JulieMDPanneton And to just dismiss such evidence, rather than consider it to raise alarm bells and think there
@LivGoesRogue @ToddSmithPC When we look for scientific evidence, Cochrane is the gold standard https://t.co/HSRMyZGMzY https://t.co/NHeqlcpiih
@StarlightMcKenz @emmadimps @thewoodbug @CaptainK77 What do you mean by early interventions? Most EIBI for autism are of limited effectiveness and have poor evidence base: https://t.co/T2hyGx5wSx
@AutisticDoctor @AnnMemmott The burden of evidence should be with those proposing it. It is no gold standard imv https://t.co/3sg9gKESgQ
RT @abaukdiscussion: Research papers and articles linking #ABA and #PBS to harm #ABAResearch #ABAharm #BetterWaysThanABA https://t.co/Yte8…
#TodayInABA independent update review of EIBI research concludes the evidence is of low/ very low quality. #ABAresearch
@Mistress_Gloom @AutismSupers @Susanne_2424 @crippledcommie @fordnation Perhaps because of the evidence? https://t.co/3sg9gKESgQ
@StarlightMcKenz @mrhunsaker Are you for real? It happened: Here Cochran’s concluded in its latest update review that evidence is low to very low https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS
@LogicalFallacy4 @crippledcommie @SheriRadoux Yep the book will. ABAers show no care about bias or CoI and like to hold others to higher standards. for example Indep research that ABA evidence low/v low https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS Indep review discredited
@LouisBusch @ToddSmithPC @JillDunlop1 @ONSocialService @ChildrenON Here are the conclusions of the Cochrane Review: https://t.co/8bc5TOfe2Z
@lisa_orsi @InfiniteEcho97 Exactly the kind of measures that need to be questioned. Also the evidence is not good anyway: https://t.co/3sg9gKWt8o
@ndcritical @DeviantLissy @crippledcommie The article talks about #ABA progs and links to the Cochrane meta analysis of EIBI research review which it defines as intensive (more 20 hrs week) ABA. Conclusion: Low to very low quality. #ABAResearch Full rese
@AlineSociology It may not be your job to educate but if you’re on a public forum claiming something is scientifically-based and someone asks for evidence, the onus is on you to provide it. Here’s some analysis of recent studies: https://t.co/8bc5TOfe2Z
@Spectrum BCBA Dillenburger thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not according to independent reviews eg Cochrane 2018 (https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS) https://t.co/HzzoKw4SaS…) #ABA
@Spectrum BCBA Dillenburger thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not according to independent reviews eg Cochrane 2018 (link: (link: https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS) https://t.co/HzzoKw4SaS…) (link: https://t.co/HzzoKw4SaS) h
@drpmonaghan 4) the evidence base and research has been independently rated as low/very low by Cochrane, @NICEComms and @signguidelines. Eg https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS
RT @abaukdiscussion: @Spectrum @QUBelfast BCBA Dillenburger thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not…
RT @abaukdiscussion: @Spectrum @QUBelfast BCBA Dillenburger @CentreBA thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evide…
@Spectrum @QUBelfast BCBA Dillenburger @CentreBA thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not according to independent reviews eg Cochrane 2018 https://t.co/yQ77RfqSnq #ABA @prof_standards @QUBelfast
@Spectrum BCBA Dillenburger @CentreBA thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not according to independent reviews eg Cochrane 2018 (https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS) #ABA @prof_standards @QUBelfast
RT @abaukdiscussion: @Spectrum @QUBelfast BCBA Dillenburger thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not…
RT @abaukdiscussion: @Spectrum @QUBelfast BCBA Dillenburger thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not…
@Spectrum @QUBelfast BCBA Dillenburger thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not according to independent reviews eg Cochrane 2018 (link: https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS) https://t.co/HzzoKw4SaS… #ABA
@RyanHendry94 @Spectrum BCBA Dillenburger thinks that 50 yrs of poor quality, biased #ABAresearch = solid evidence 😂 Not according to independent reviews eg Cochrane 2018 https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS #ABA
コクラン共同計画から、早期からの集中した介入のシステマティック・レビュー論文が出ています。フルテキスト入手可能。弱いエビデンスが認められ悪影響は無いとされていますね。結局手間と期待効果を天秤にかけることになるんだな。https://t.co/SplQ8uWTkg
RT @milton_damian: @Georgin24661487 @abaukdiscussion @Richard_Autism @ShonaDav Here you go: https://t.co/Wdn2sY38SW and https://t.co/xUF4Oq…
RT @abaukdiscussion: Research papers and articles linking #ABA and #PBS to harm #ABAResearch #ABAharm #BetterWaysThanABA https://t.co/Yte8…
Research papers and articles linking #ABA and #PBS to harm #ABAResearch #ABAharm #BetterWaysThanABA
RT @milton_damian: @Georgin24661487 @abaukdiscussion @Richard_Autism @ShonaDav Here you go: https://t.co/Wdn2sY38SW and https://t.co/xUF4Oq…
RT @milton_damian: @Georgin24661487 @abaukdiscussion @Richard_Autism @ShonaDav Here you go: https://t.co/Wdn2sY38SW and https://t.co/xUF4Oq…
@Georgin24661487 @abaukdiscussion @Richard_Autism @ShonaDav Here you go: https://t.co/Wdn2sY38SW and https://t.co/xUF4Oq4cB5 and https://t.co/5fSwLW1qts and https://t.co/NPYYPZgyps and https://t.co/3sg9gKESgQ also useful.
@UsualSuspect4u @Autismmylife 🤣 ABA is poorly regulated the @BACB_Inc is not fit for purpose (no follow up of eg Mary Barbera breaching their Code of Ethics); data is a problem (see photo); the science is poor (https://t.co/CXbCj5jr7W); 5 poor quality res
RT @abaukdiscussion: @Sarahgillmore1 @crippledcommie @kallylyn @SarahAne8 @MTaylorNDP @MacLeodLisa @A4AOntario This is also evidence showin…
@Sarahgillmore1 @crippledcommie @kallylyn @SarahAne8 @MTaylorNDP @MacLeodLisa @A4AOntario This is also evidence showing ABA research is low/ v low quality https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS
@Beata61033566 @RobbinsRose @asdpsychnerd You’re promoting inten$ive ABA: where is your quality science that autistic kids have best longer term outcomes from it? Where is your science addressing it’s psychological harm? https://t.co/yIiQJM5EyS See us o
@KirbyLevelsUp @Prettyspazz @krushowy @TorontoStar Finding an alternative equivalent or better )and less $$$) is easy as the quality of IBI is low/very low: https://t.co/yQ77RfqSnq
@TerriO999 Here is a review of evidence for one type used with children: https://t.co/3sg9gKESgQ
RT @abaukdiscussion: Low standards for #ABAResesech: Self-publication, self-citation, questionable or no independent peer review and no ret…
RT @abaukdiscussion: Low standards for #ABAResesech: Self-publication, self-citation, questionable or no independent peer review and no ret…
RT @abaukdiscussion: Low standards for #ABAResesech: Self-publication, self-citation, questionable or no independent peer review and no ret…
Low standards for #ABAResesech: Self-publication, self-citation, questionable or no independent peer review and no retraction. Perhaps that’s one reason why despite 100s of #ABA research papers, quality is assessed low/very low: https://t.co/GlBm7q4gGN
@JonGalt4 @autistictic ABA is about control & BCBA research is poor, eg 1) https://t.co/wA6SeQuoMO N. Ireland gov BCBA research discredited 2) NHS NICE and SIGN: evidence for ABA programmes poor 3) Cochrane 2018 review of ABA research concluded it'
@ShonaDav @DrNancyFreeman The gold standard *evaluations* of research evidence are AHRQ https://t.co/HbsoQE3mcK Cochrane https://t.co/ZOwzb0yUic and NICE https://t.co/Xryw2qjjFJ (all of which state there is no gold standard research *evidence*).
@ligitchik ABA research quality low to very low from this independent review: https://t.co/yQ77Rf9hvS
@PaulSmithTO @ShonaDav @PaulVirides @abigail_clay_ @E_c_h_o @allinarowplay The situation is overall sad and frustrating. If you want it, the Cochran review is a good start to understanding why the evidence base for ABA is weak: https://t.co/0THEp4kIuh
@ResnetSharland The intensity one needs to use ABA to train a person without regard to cognitive differences makes its efficacy highly questionable. Supported by Cochrane updated review of the evidence of ABA/EIBI https://t.co/JTfDEqNeyy
RT @milton_damian: Or you could do some? https://t.co/ElISYCeeQq and you may also want to look up the evidence base too https://t.co/3sg9gK…
RT @milton_damian: Or you could do some? https://t.co/ElISYCeeQq and you may also want to look up the evidence base too https://t.co/3sg9gK…
RT @milton_damian: Or you could do some? https://t.co/ElISYCeeQq and you may also want to look up the evidence base too https://t.co/3sg9gK…
@LouisBusch @timporter_ONT Sorry to butt in but here you go https://t.co/3sg9gKESgQ not that impressive after all.
Or you could do some? https://t.co/ElISYCeeQq and you may also want to look up the evidence base too https://t.co/3sg9gKESgQ. You may also wish to be less abusive in your dogmatism?
“Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)” https://t.co/LImVWUEFBO
RT @abaukdiscussion: @nwalton2502 @NikolaNeenaj @meowcarriemeow @lynchauthor @NeuroRebel @Autism @stevesilberman The important thing is tha…
@nwalton2502 @NikolaNeenaj @meowcarriemeow @lynchauthor @NeuroRebel @Autism @stevesilberman The important thing is that there are no studies showing that ABA resulted in better long term outcome or wellbeing. Independent reviews conclude research is poor q
RT @afcp_01: 自閉スペクトラム症に対する早期集中介入 (EIBI) を扱ったコクランのレビュー、更新されていたんだな。 https://t.co/rYrhXZM2qT コクランの基準に適うような研究はまだ5つしかないのか。まだまだ研究の余地はある感じだねえ。
RT @afcp_01: 自閉スペクトラム症に対する早期集中介入 (EIBI) を扱ったコクランのレビュー、更新されていたんだな。 https://t.co/rYrhXZM2qT コクランの基準に適うような研究はまだ5つしかないのか。まだまだ研究の余地はある感じだねえ。
RT @afcp_01: 自閉スペクトラム症に対する早期集中介入 (EIBI) を扱ったコクランのレビュー、更新されていたんだな。 https://t.co/rYrhXZM2qT コクランの基準に適うような研究はまだ5つしかないのか。まだまだ研究の余地はある感じだねえ。
RT @afcp_01: 自閉スペクトラム症に対する早期集中介入 (EIBI) を扱ったコクランのレビュー、更新されていたんだな。 https://t.co/rYrhXZM2qT コクランの基準に適うような研究はまだ5つしかないのか。まだまだ研究の余地はある感じだねえ。
RT @afcp_01: 自閉スペクトラム症に対する早期集中介入 (EIBI) を扱ったコクランのレビュー、更新されていたんだな。 https://t.co/rYrhXZM2qT コクランの基準に適うような研究はまだ5つしかないのか。まだまだ研究の余地はある感じだねえ。
RT @afcp_01: 自閉スペクトラム症に対する早期集中介入 (EIBI) を扱ったコクランのレビュー、更新されていたんだな。 https://t.co/rYrhXZM2qT コクランの基準に適うような研究はまだ5つしかないのか。まだまだ研究の余地はある感じだねえ。
RT @afcp_01: 自閉スペクトラム症に対する早期集中介入 (EIBI) を扱ったコクランのレビュー、更新されていたんだな。 https://t.co/rYrhXZM2qT コクランの基準に適うような研究はまだ5つしかないのか。まだまだ研究の余地はある感じだねえ。