↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicines for acute pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicines for acute pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003631.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiong Wang, Zhen Guo, Pengcheng Zhao, Yiping Wang, Tao Gan, Jinlin Yang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Librarian 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,992,367
of 21,546,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,710
of 12,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,930
of 250,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#199
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,546,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.