| Title |
Chinese herbal medicines for acute pancreatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003631.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiong Wang, Zhen Guo, Pengcheng Zhao, Yiping Wang, Tao Gan, Jinlin Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Librarian | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,648,703
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,741
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,323
of 159,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.