↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Teicoplanin versus vancomycin for proven or suspected infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Teicoplanin versus vancomycin for proven or suspected infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007022.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre B Cavalcanti, Anderson R Goncalves, Claudia S Almeida, Diogo DG Bugano, Eliezer Silva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 36 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#10,638,028
of 17,083,063 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,824
of 11,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,774
of 284,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,083,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.