↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Teicoplanin versus vancomycin for proven or suspected infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Teicoplanin versus vancomycin for proven or suspected infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007022.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre B Cavalcanti, Anderson R Goncalves, Claudia S Almeida, Diogo DG Bugano, Eliezer Silva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,987,707
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,679
of 12,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,717
of 84,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.