| Title |
Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001730.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lesley Brown, Anne Forster, John Young, Tom Crocker, Alex Benham, Peter Langhorne, Day Hospital Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 39% |
| Canada | 6 | 14% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 83 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 13% |
| Psychology | 16 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 94 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,280,728
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,686
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,370
of 278,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.