↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001730.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesley Brown, Anne Forster, John Young, Tom Crocker, Alex Benham, Peter Langhorne, Day Hospital Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 282 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 91 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 13%
Psychology 16 6%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 103 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,657,362
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,378
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,748
of 279,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.