↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hydrogel dressings for treating pressure ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogel dressings for treating pressure ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011226.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Nikki Stubbs, Samantha J Keogh, Rachel M Walker, Zhenmi Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 245 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 19%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 76 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 16%
Psychology 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 83 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,357,249
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,672
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,697
of 269,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.