↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous magnesium for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous magnesium for acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002755.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Li, Qing Zhang, Mingming Zhang, Matthias Egger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Professor 6 8%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,404,814
of 15,606,530 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,291
of 11,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,538
of 280,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#169
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.