The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Educational interventions for improving primary caregiver complementary feeding practices for children aged 24 months and under
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011768.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dachi Arikpo, Ededet Sewanu Edet, Moriam T Chibuzor, Friday Odey, Deborah M Caldwell |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 12% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 58% |
| Scientists | 9 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 886 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 886 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 106 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 94 | 11% |
| Researcher | 74 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 36 | 4% |
| Other | 162 | 18% |
| Unknown | 360 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 170 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 156 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 41 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 22 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 83 | 9% |
| Unknown | 392 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,375,209
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,723
of 13,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,146
of 347,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.