| Title |
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001977.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Manheimer, Ke Cheng, Klaus Linde, Lixing Lao, Junghee Yoo, Susan Wieland, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Brian M Berman, Lex M Bouter |
| Abstract |
Peripheral joint osteoarthritis is a major cause of pain and functional limitation. Few treatments are safe and effective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 25% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 406 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 73 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 15% |
| Researcher | 38 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 78 | 19% |
| Unknown | 93 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 166 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 12% |
| Psychology | 19 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 10% |
| Unknown | 111 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#369,078
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#631
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,221
of 172,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.