↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cardioselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
265 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Cardioselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003566.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelley R Salpeter, Thomas M Ormiston, Edwin E Salpeter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 167 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 13 7%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 51 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,426,195
of 21,414,377 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,366
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,602
of 245,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,414,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.