| Title |
Multidisciplinary care for Guillain‐Barré syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008505.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fary Khan, Louisa Ng, Bhasker Amatya, Caroline Brand, Lynne Turner‐Stokes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 417 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 14% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 67 | 16% |
| Unknown | 118 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 20% |
| Psychology | 18 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 9% |
| Unknown | 128 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,857,628
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,973
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,564
of 108,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.