↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Non‐pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006275.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pillai Riddell RR, Racine NM, Turcotte K, Uman LS, Horton RE, Din Osmun L, Ahola Kohut S, Hillgrove Stuart J, Stevens B, Gerwitz-Stern A

Abstract

Infant acute pain and distress is commonplace. Infancy is a period of exponential development. Unrelieved pain and distress can have implications across the lifespan. 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 143 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Researcher 18 12%
Other 17 11%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 17%
Psychology 11 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 19 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,205,238
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,126
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,151
of 120,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.