Title |
Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003439.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chris Lovato, Allison Watts, Lindsay F Stead |
Abstract |
The tobacco industry denies that their marketing is targeted at young nonsmokers, but it seems more probable that tobacco advertising and promotion influences the attitudes of nonsmoking adolescents, and makes them more likely to try smoking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 11 | 22% |
Switzerland | 6 | 12% |
Germany | 2 | 4% |
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 24 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 46 | 94% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 414 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 65 | 15% |
Researcher | 56 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
Other | 78 | 18% |
Unknown | 130 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 41 | 10% |
Psychology | 37 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 7% |
Unspecified | 13 | 3% |
Other | 64 | 15% |
Unknown | 150 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#588,259
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,043
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,214
of 145,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.