↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Individual patient education for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
521 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Individual patient education for low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004057.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arno J Engers, Petra Jellema, Michel Wensing, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Richard Grol, Maurits W van Tulder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 521 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 4 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 502 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 19%
Student > Bachelor 68 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 11%
Researcher 52 10%
Student > Postgraduate 50 10%
Other 121 23%
Unknown 77 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 212 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 18%
Psychology 25 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Other 51 10%
Unknown 104 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#868,801
of 17,379,776 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,269
of 11,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,764
of 121,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,379,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.