| Title |
Individual patient education for low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004057.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arno J Engers, Petra Jellema, Michel Wensing, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Richard Grol, Maurits W van Tulder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Singapore | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 644 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 625 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 104 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 90 | 14% |
| Researcher | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 8% |
| Other | 139 | 22% |
| Unknown | 137 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 233 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 115 | 18% |
| Psychology | 32 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 9% |
| Unknown | 168 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,240,285
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,840
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,067
of 158,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.