↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Canadian C-spine rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) for detecting clinically important cervical spine injury following blunt trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Canadian C-spine rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) for detecting clinically important cervical spine injury following blunt trauma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012989
Authors

Bruno T Saragiotto, Christopher G Maher, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Arianne P Verhagen, Stacy Goergen, Zoe A Michaleff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 28%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 18 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,616,408
of 17,854,173 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,974
of 11,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,952
of 287,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,854,173 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.