| Title |
Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001704.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen HG Handoll, Catherine Sherrington, Jenson CS Mak |
| Abstract |
Hip fracture mainly occurs in older people. Strategies to improve mobility include gait retraining, various forms of exercise and muscle stimulation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 660 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 645 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 98 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 96 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 10% |
| Researcher | 58 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 7% |
| Other | 146 | 22% |
| Unknown | 145 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 213 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 100 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 29 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 90 | 14% |
| Unknown | 183 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,664,859
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,041
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,948
of 108,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.