↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000006.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Kettle, Therese Dowswell, Khaled MK Ismail

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Postgraduate 17 14%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Psychology 10 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 31 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2015.
All research outputs
#10,730,430
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,606
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,345
of 238,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#212
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.