↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000006.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Kettle, Therese Dowswell, Khaled MK Ismail

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 152 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 17%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 44 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Psychology 10 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 53 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,724,309
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,103
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,139
of 84,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.