The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007373.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laureen M Lopez, Alissa Bernholc, Yanwu Zeng, Rebecca H Allen, Deborah Bartz, Paul A O'Brien, David Hubacher |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 347 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 14% |
| Researcher | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 18% |
| Unknown | 111 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 126 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 500. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2024.
All research outputs
#55,788
of 26,627,710 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#460
of 276,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,627,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.