↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
56 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
35 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007373.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laureen M Lopez, Alissa Bernholc, Yanwu Zeng, Rebecca H Allen, Deborah Bartz, Paul A O'Brien, David Hubacher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 323 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 15%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 22 7%
Other 61 19%
Unknown 95 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Psychology 9 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 111 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 477. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#56,604
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#495
of 275,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.