↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
Title
Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002822.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Dagfinrud, Kåre Birger Hagen, Tore K Kvien

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 374 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 17%
Student > Bachelor 54 14%
Researcher 24 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Other 73 19%
Unknown 121 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 11%
Sports and Recreations 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 131 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,950,267
of 26,032,395 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,028
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,731
of 171,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,032,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.