↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laser and photoepilation for unwanted hair growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Laser and photoepilation for unwanted hair growth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004684.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Merete Haedersdal, Peter C Gøtzsche

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 19 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,691,640
of 22,050,620 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,369
of 12,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,506
of 297,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,050,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.