↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001757.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven R Brown, Himanshu Wadhawan, Richard L Nelson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Other 13 6%
Other 49 24%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Psychology 10 5%
Unspecified 9 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 45 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,415,213
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,937
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,334
of 246,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#206
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.