↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001452.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vibhuti S Shah, Arne Ohlsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 112 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 30 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 32 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,567,493
of 21,843,592 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,342
of 12,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,727
of 265,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#207
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,843,592 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.