| Title |
Flupenthixol versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009227.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdolna Tardy, Markus Dold, Rolf R Engel, Stefan Leucht |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 28% |
| Psychology | 23 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 64 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,467,888
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,948
of 12,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,442
of 237,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#191
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.