↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
825 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009416.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil E O'Connell, Benedict M Wand, James H McAuley, Louise Marston, G L Moseley

Abstract

There is currently no strong consensus regarding the optimal management of complex regional pain syndrome although a multitude of interventions have been described and are commonly used.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 825 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 810 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 164 20%
Student > Bachelor 121 15%
Other 70 8%
Researcher 70 8%
Student > Postgraduate 62 8%
Other 195 24%
Unknown 143 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 308 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 150 18%
Psychology 39 5%
Neuroscience 30 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 3%
Other 99 12%
Unknown 171 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#361,281
of 21,732,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#684
of 12,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,249
of 247,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,732,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.