The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Citrate salts for preventing and treating calcium containing kidney stones in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010057.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca Phillips, Vishwanath S Hanchanale, Andy Myatt, Bhaskar Somani, Ghulam Nabi, C Shekhar Biyani |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
Ecuador | 2 | 10% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Turkey | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 185 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 11% |
Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
Other | 32 | 17% |
Unknown | 70 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 11% |
Unknown | 79 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 280. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#136,321
of 26,625,282 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#240
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,606
of 290,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,625,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.