↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intra-articular lignocaine versus intravenous analgesia with or without sedation for manual reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Intra-articular lignocaine versus intravenous analgesia with or without sedation for manual reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004919.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abel Wakai, Ronan O'Sullivan, Aileen McCabe

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence regarding the use of intra-articular lignocaine injection for the closed manual reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations. A systematic review may help cohere the conflicting evidence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Psychology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 38 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,126,738
of 21,329,785 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,680
of 12,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,956
of 248,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,329,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.