| Title |
Misoprostol for induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second or third trimester for women with a fetal anomaly or after intrauterine fetal death
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004901.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 41 | 26% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,977,148
of 23,720,526 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,589
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,091
of 97,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,720,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.