↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effect of social franchising on access to and quality of health services in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The effect of social franchising on access to and quality of health services in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007136.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracey Perez Koehlmoos, Rukhsana Gazi, Shahed Hossain, K Zaman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 166 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 21%
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 38 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,279,441
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,950
of 12,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,729
of 170,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.