↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effect of social franchising on access to and quality of health services in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The effect of social franchising on access to and quality of health services in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007136.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracey Perez Koehlmoos, Rukhsana Gazi, Shahed Hossain, K Zaman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 187 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 19%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Social Sciences 20 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 53 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,876,156
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,538
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,364
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.