↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise in prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression among children and young people

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
386 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
901 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Exercise in prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression among children and young people
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004691.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lillebeth Larun, Lena V. Nordheim, Eilin Ekeland, Kåre Birger Hagen, Frode Heian

Abstract

Depression and anxiety are common psychological disorders for children and adolescents. Psychological (e.g. psychotherapy), psychosocial (e.g. cognitive behavioral therapy) and biological (e.g. SSRIs or tricyclic drugs) treatments are the most common treatments being offered. The large variety of therapeutic interventions give rise to questions of clinical effectiveness and side effects. Physical exercise is inexpensive with few, if any, side effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 901 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 884 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 155 17%
Student > Bachelor 127 14%
Researcher 93 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 64 7%
Other 146 16%
Unknown 233 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 203 23%
Psychology 138 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 8%
Sports and Recreations 74 8%
Social Sciences 48 5%
Other 104 12%
Unknown 259 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,491,095
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,177
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,633
of 90,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.