↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007260.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter L Wang, Steven C Brooks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 333 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 25 8%
Other 17 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 4%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 145 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 15%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 162 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,329,324
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,814
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,446
of 342,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.