@JMedic2JDoc @joshkimbre @JSweenen @BrooksWalsh Cochrane Systematic Review: https://t.co/2NMkFFQ0YY. 2020 AHA Guidelines on ECC and CPR: Mechanical CPR. Part 3: Adult BLS and ALS, 6.2 https://t.co/uqc3mytLwl
はえーすごい。って思って何本か論文読んでみたらまぁ妥当な結果ばかりだった。 やる側が被曝しないくらいがメリットかな。知らんけど。 https://t.co/FpvBBTfGdW https://t.co/gtVcE1iivE https://t.co/gtVcE1iivE
@Faisal_ghazwani In some situations such as limited number of rescuers and conditions such as hypothermic cardiac arrest, LUCAS may be better than manual CPR. In terms of survival outcomes, LUCAS is not superior to manual CPR. https://t.co/qlKFuJnqXd
RT @emlitofnote: @ZSSweeney @movinmeat @Aidan_Baron @First10EM I’d say the Cochrane authors’ summary is pretty much spot-on: https://t.co/…
@ZSSweeney @movinmeat @Aidan_Baron @First10EM I’d say the Cochrane authors’ summary is pretty much spot-on: https://t.co/2YKHBORMpT https://t.co/gsZdbFXCHA
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest - PubMed https://t.co/rlTXznOxi5
@philalmond5 @proftomquinn @rugbyspaniel @SCAS999 There essentially is no improvement in survival rates, and I agree the human elements and bandwidth needs further exploration. However I would suggest that sitting down instead of standing up in a fast movi
@rugbyspaniel @SCAS999 I haven’t been able to find much evidence of benefit but i would guess it’s all relative to trial design etc etc https://t.co/3j6lEQ21OE
@frauherzdoc @DenniSge Es gibt ein Cochrane Review, die hatten damals mehrere RCTs identifiziert, wenn diese auch recht klein waren: https://t.co/2EbQRHRYx6
Qual a efetividade das estratégias de ressuscitação com compressões torácicas mecânicas versus compressões torácicas manuais em pacientes que sofreram uma parada cardíaca? Nova tradução da Cochrane Brazil. https://t.co/DW8amyWPL4 https://t.co/zpLitsxTCZ
@kevgill3 @VivForde @thejournal_ie And the Cochrane Review https://t.co/jCYNOreV93
@Ldsgz @JooMcl Tiens la revue Cochrane fait ça aussi bien (mieux!) que moi : https://t.co/eZL0T0zRmA Sinon ya https://t.co/xaXLSikPiJ https://t.co/Jg8eSniP4h Et on attend les résultats de https://t.co/2kbbBEmrwW
RT @Cochrane_ACE: This review about the topic by @CochraneHeart was published last year: “Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for c…
This review about the topic by @CochraneHeart was published last year: “Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest” https://t.co/sDU8DJPDQl
Did you know? Mechanical chest compression devices exist for CPR. A Cochrane review showed that the devices are not superior to manual compressions, but they may be useful when manual compressions are not possible or dangerous to the provider. #CincyAI ht
According to Wang & Brooks, 2018., Mechancial is not superior to mannual, emphazises should continue to remain on continious compressions and defibrillation as early as possible/ Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. https://t
We're not redundant yet!! - "The evidence does not suggest that CPR protocols involving mechanical chest compression devices are superior to conventional therapy involving manual chest compressions only." https://t.co/VpYYyd6gC1 https://t.co/tuIZC58neC
RT @FOAMecmo: Effectiveness of resuscitation using mechanical compressions vs manual compressions with respect to neuro intact survival in…
RT @FOAMecmo: Effectiveness of resuscitation using mechanical compressions vs manual compressions with respect to neuro intact survival in…