↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
Title
Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010720.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul V Beirne, Sarah Hennessy, Sharon L Cadogan, Frances Shiely, Tony Fitzgerald, Fiona MacLeod

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 388 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 16%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Other 19 5%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 144 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 15%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 159 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,708,043
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,342
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,719
of 341,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.