↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
Title
Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010720.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul V Beirne, Sarah Hennessy, Sharon L Cadogan, Frances Shiely, Tony Fitzgerald, Fiona MacLeod

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 397 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 16%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Researcher 37 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Other 19 5%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 151 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 15%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 166 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,923,022
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,494
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,042
of 345,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.