↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies for sickle cell disease and pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
532 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies for sickle cell disease and pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001916.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kofi A Anie, John Green

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 532 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 526 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 14%
Student > Bachelor 62 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 11%
Researcher 50 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 6%
Other 89 17%
Unknown 166 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 20%
Psychology 70 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 13%
Social Sciences 21 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 2%
Other 71 13%
Unknown 180 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,637,825
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,306
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,588
of 280,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.