↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Once-daily long-acting beta₂-agonists/inhaled corticosteroids combined inhalers versus inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Once-daily long-acting beta₂-agonists/inhaled corticosteroids combined inhalers versus inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012355.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnieszka Sliwka, Milosz Jankowski, Iwona Gross-Sondej, Monika Storman, Roman Nowobilski, Malgorzata M Bala

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 46 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,658,454
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,947
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,183
of 288,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.