| Title |
Impact of medication reconciliation for improving transitions of care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010791.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Redmond, Tamasine C Grimes, Ronan McDonnell, Fiona Boland, Carmel Hughes, Tom Fahey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Mexico | 2 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 472 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 10% |
| Researcher | 43 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 85 | 18% |
| Unknown | 168 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 55 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 45 | 10% |
| Unknown | 195 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,122,144
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,280
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,379
of 345,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.